Home / Benchmarks
Open-model AI benchmarks (September 2026)
Published evaluation results for DeepSeek V4.1, GLM-5.3, Kimi K3, Qwen3.8, and MiniMax M3 — agentic coding, software engineering, science reasoning, web research, and security — with charts, sources, and independent checks.
Terminal-Bench 2.1 score by model release date (2026)
Open models closed most of the gap on agentic terminal work in a single summer: from 66.0 in June to 90.6 in September.
View chart data as a table
| Model | Released | Terminal-Bench 2.1 (%) |
|---|---|---|
| MiniMax M3 | Jun 1 | 66.0 |
| GLM-5.2 | Jun 13 | 81.0 |
| Kimi K3 | Jul 16 | 88.3 |
| Qwen3.8-Max | Aug 3 | 86.6 |
| GLM-5.3 | Aug 14 | 88.2 |
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | Sep 10 | 90.6 |
Results by benchmark
Each table is sorted by score. Models without a published result are omitted rather than guessed.
| Model | Score (%) |
|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek · live on kryyt | |
| Kimi K3Moonshot AI | |
| GLM-5.3Z.ai (Zhipu) | |
| Qwen3.8-MaxAlibaba Cloud | |
| GLM-5.3 FlashZ.ai (Zhipu) | |
| MiniMax M3MiniMax |
Sources: DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash model card (NVIDIA) (opens in new tab); Moonshot AI Kimi K3 model card (opens in new tab); GLM-5.3 benchmarks (MindStudio, citing Z.ai) (opens in new tab); Qwen 3.8 benchmarks (Apidog, citing Alibaba) (opens in new tab); GLM-5.3-Flash benchmarks (DataCamp, citing Z.ai) (opens in new tab); MiniMax M3 launch coverage (VentureBeat) (opens in new tab).
| Model | Score (%) |
|---|---|
| Kimi K3Moonshot AI | |
| Qwen3.8-MaxAlibaba Cloud | |
| DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek · live on kryyt |
Sources: Moonshot AI Kimi K3 model card (opens in new tab); Qwen3.8-Max benchmarks (DataCamp, citing Alibaba) (opens in new tab); DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash model card (NVIDIA) (opens in new tab).
| Model | Score (%) |
|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek · live on kryyt | |
| Kimi K3Moonshot AI | |
| GLM-5.3 FlashZ.ai (Zhipu) |
Sources: DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash model card (NVIDIA) (opens in new tab); Moonshot AI Kimi K3 model card (opens in new tab); GLM-5.3-Flash benchmarks (DataCamp, citing Z.ai) (opens in new tab).
| Model | Score (%) |
|---|---|
| Qwen3.8-MaxAlibaba Cloud | |
| GLM-5.2Z.ai (Zhipu) | |
| MiniMax M3MiniMax |
Sources: Qwen3.8-Max benchmarks (DataCamp, citing Alibaba) (opens in new tab); Z.ai GLM-5 series repository (opens in new tab); MiniMax M3 launch coverage (VentureBeat) (opens in new tab).
| Model | Score (%) |
|---|---|
| Qwen3.8-MaxAlibaba Cloud | |
| Kimi K3Moonshot AI |
Sources: Qwen 3.8 benchmarks (Apidog, citing Alibaba) (opens in new tab); Moonshot AI Kimi K3 model card (opens in new tab).
| Model | Score (%) |
|---|---|
| Kimi K3Moonshot AI | |
| MiniMax M3MiniMax |
Sources: Moonshot AI Kimi K3 model card (opens in new tab); MiniMax M3 launch coverage (VentureBeat) (opens in new tab).
| Model | Score (%) |
|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek · live on kryyt | |
| GLM-5.3Z.ai (Zhipu) |
Sources: DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash model card (NVIDIA) (opens in new tab); GLM-5.3 benchmarks (Emergent, citing Z.ai) (opens in new tab).
Vendor-reported vs independent results
Scores can shift by several points depending on who runs the eval and with which agent harness.
| Benchmark | Scores (%) |
|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 — Kimi K3Vendor vs Artificial Analysis | |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1 — MiniMax M3Vendor vs Vals AI |
Sources: Kimi K3 benchmark caveats (Emergent, citing Artificial Analysis) (opens in new tab); Vals AI — independent MiniMax M3 evaluation (opens in new tab); Moonshot AI Kimi K3 model card (opens in new tab); MiniMax M3 launch coverage (VentureBeat) (opens in new tab).
DeepSeek on GPQA Diamond, generation by generation
DeepSeek's science-reasoning score climbed more than 30 points across five releases.
View chart data as a table
| Model | Released | GPQA Diamond (%) |
|---|---|---|
| V3 | Dec 2024 | 59.1 |
| R1 | Jan 2025 | 71.5 |
| R1-0528 | May 2025 | 81.0 |
| V4 Flash | Apr 2026 | 89.9 |
| V4.1 Flash | Sep 2026 | 90.9 |
What each benchmark measures
- Terminal-Bench 2.1
- Agentic coding in real terminal environments.
- GPQA Diamond
- Graduate-level science reasoning.
- DeepSWE v1.1
- Repairing fresh, real-world software issues.
- SWE-bench Pro
- Resolving issues in professional codebases.
- Humanity's Last Exam
- Frontier knowledge and reasoning (no tools).
- BrowseComp
- Autonomous web research.
- CyberGym
- Security vulnerability discovery.
- NL2Repo-Bench
- Generating whole repositories from a spec.
- AutomationBench
- Workflow-automation agents.
- Agents' Last Exam
- Long-horizon agentic tasks.
- Terminal-Bench 3.0
- Harder next-generation terminal tasks.
- FrontierSWE
- Frontier-difficulty software engineering.
- MMMU-Pro
- Multimodal, college-level reasoning.
- PaperBench
- Reproducing ML research papers.
- OSWorld-Verified
- Operating a real desktop computer.
- IFBench
- Precise instruction following.
- MCP Atlas
- Tool use through MCP servers.
Benchmark FAQ
Which open model scores best on agentic coding?
On Terminal-Bench 2.1 — the benchmark every lab in our roster reports — DeepSeek V4.1 Flash leads at 90.6, followed by Kimi K3 (88.3), GLM-5.3 (88.2), and Qwen3.8-Max (86.6), all vendor-reported. On DeepSWE v1.1, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (74.2) also leads Kimi K3 (67.5).
Which model is strongest on science reasoning?
On GPQA Diamond, Kimi K3 reports 93.5, Qwen3.8-Max 92.6, and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 90.9. GLM-5.3 and MiniMax M3 have not published GPQA Diamond results.
Are these benchmark scores independent?
Most are vendor-reported. Where independent measurements exist we show them: Artificial Analysis measured Kimi K3 at 85 on Terminal-Bench 2.1 (vs 88.3 reported), and Vals AI measured MiniMax M3 at 53.6 (vs 66.0 reported). Harness and settings differences explain much of the gap.
Which of these models can I use on kryyt today?
Kryyt AI, powered by DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, is live now in browser chat, the VS Code extension, and the OpenAI-compatible API. GLM, Kimi, Qwen, and MiniMax models are coming soon.
How often is this page updated?
We update results when labs publish new models or revised evaluations. Figures on this page are current as of September 2026.
Sources
- DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash model card (NVIDIA) (opens in new tab)
- DeepSeek API change log (opens in new tab)
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash review (Build Fast with AI) (opens in new tab)
- DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash technical report (opens in new tab)
- DeepSeek-V3 technical report (opens in new tab)
- Z.ai GLM-5 series repository (opens in new tab)
- GLM-5.3 benchmarks (MindStudio, citing Z.ai) (opens in new tab)
- GLM-5.3 benchmarks (Emergent, citing Z.ai) (opens in new tab)
- GLM-5.3-Flash benchmarks (DataCamp, citing Z.ai) (opens in new tab)
- Moonshot AI Kimi K3 model card (opens in new tab)
- Kimi K3 benchmark caveats (Emergent, citing Artificial Analysis) (opens in new tab)
- MiniMax M3 launch coverage (VentureBeat) (opens in new tab)
- MiniMax-M2 series technical report (opens in new tab)
- Qwen3.8-Max benchmarks (DataCamp, citing Alibaba) (opens in new tab)
- Qwen 3.8 benchmarks (Apidog, citing Alibaba) (opens in new tab)
- Vals AI — independent MiniMax M3 evaluation (opens in new tab)
Ship with one endpoint
Get a key, change your base URL, and call every model on this page. No new SDKs.